The nominated boss of US military machines has
to fight his way through Senate confirmation proceedings before he takes the
driving seat to stop and think about US global wars. He is a staunch critic of
Israel and some believe that if he had earned ire of Israel, he may have to
work very hard to be appointed US Defense Secretary. Criticizing
Israel is no less than an act of blasphemy and criticism by someone from the US
can dash all his hopes to be someone important in the administration. Sen.
Chuck Hegel from Nebraska and a decorated Vietnam veteran, recently nominated
to take the reins of US war machine as Secretary Defense is expected to face
tough resistance from pro-Israeli lobby in the Senate. His acts of commission
include the unforgivable stand against Israel. His appointment is subject to
confirmation by the Senate where Republicans are keenly awaiting to quiz him on
Israel and his other controversial views resented by Israel. They openly
describe him to be the most antagonistic secretary of defense towards the state
of Israel in our nation's history.
Does
his nomination for the coveted slot give any indication of US ignoring the
concerns of its ally, Israel? Can he survive the onslaught and be confirmed by
pro-Israeli lobby in the Senate? Let us see.
According
to The
Telegraph, despite being a fellow Republican who sat in
the Senate for the party from 1997 to 2009, Mr. Hagel holds markedly less
hawkish views on foreign and military policy than many former colleagues. The
66-year-old Vietnam veteran endorsed Mr. Obama, a Democrat, in 2008, having
criticized the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and urging a less gung-ho approach
to America's alliance with Israel. In a 2006 interview he said that the
"political reality" of Washington was that "the Jewish lobby
intimidates a lot of people up here", prompting allegations that his views
verged on anti-Semitic. But he dismissed the criticism by aligning himself with
US interests saying, "I'm not an Israeli senator. I'm a United States
senator.” Mr. Hagel also voted against sanctions on Iran and urged Israel to
engage in direct talks with Hamas, the militant Islamic group.
He
is the one who, without mincing his words, clearly stated the motive for
attacking Iraq in 2003. He said, “People say we're not fighting for oil. Of
course we are. They talk about America's national interest. What the hell do
you think they're talking about? We're not there for figs.”
Michael
Moore, in his article
addressed Mr Hagel saying, “thank you, Chuck Hagel. We may not agree on much,
but we agree that politicians should tell the truth about war and peace and
life and death. We're all in your debt for that -- especially since, when it
comes to Iraq and oil, President Obama's first Republican Secretary
of Defense, Robert Gates, couldn't manage it.
Mr
Hagel may or may not sail through hostile confirmation proceedings in the Senate,
but his nomination indicates that Obama administration is not impressed with
the policies of present Israeli administration. This could be due to many
reasons, chiefly among them being Prime Minister Netanyahu's open
preference for the Republicans in the US election two months ago.
According to ALJAZEERA,
one reason for Obama's apparent indifference may be that there is almost no
possibility that Netanyahu will not be the next prime minister. The
only question is whether Netanyahu's next government will be as far right (and
pro-settlement expansion) as his current government or much farther to the
right.
Israel’s
stakes in who-occupies-White-House are very high. Every Israeli is aware that
without the support of President Obama, Israel would be in desperate straits.
The United States provides Israel with billions of dollars of aid a year, aid
which is used to purchase the weapon systems that sustains Israel's
"military edge" which enables it to both maintain the occupation and
defend itself. That aid also provides Israel with the economic cushion it needs
to preserve its immunity to the recession that has afflicted most of the world.
It is the President of the United States who decides whether to stand
(virtually alone) with Israel at the United Nations, using veto to block any
resolution that Israel opposes. It is the President who has adopted Israel's
position on Iranian nuclear development as his own, leading the effort to
punish Iran with sanctions and reiterating Israeli threats that there will be
war if Iran develops nuclear weapons (despite the fact that Israel is said to
have some 200 warheads).
In
short, Israel is almost entirely dependent on the President of the United
States. As for Congress, it matters too but, on all foreign policy matters, it
is the President who leads. That is how the United States Constitution works.
It is the President who defends the national interest abroad.
But
there is an emerging consensus by analysts that US interests are being damaged
by Israel's current course, because an Israeli government dominated by
ultra-nationalists, racists and fascists impacts on US standing throughout the
world. After all, the world (and not just the Muslim world) understands that Americans
are Israel's enabler. By opposing Hagel and preventing his nomination, pro-Israeli
lobby is trying to show to the administration that they are a force to reckon
with. That is probably why it is time for President Obama to send a clear
message to Israel by nominating former Senator Chuck Hagel to be Secretary of
Defense. There is only one way to send a message to Israel that will be heard:
It will be by nominating Hagel.
Please also read:
Can Chuck Hagel survive the onslaught of pro-Israel lobby?
Please also read:
Can Chuck Hagel survive the onslaught of pro-Israel lobby?
No comments:
Post a Comment